-
Archives
- January 2024
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- June 2020
- May 2020
- January 2020
- June 2019
- May 2019
- March 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- February 2018
- December 2017
- September 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- December 2016
- October 2016
- July 2016
- November 2015
- July 2014
- May 2014
- October 2013
- January 2013
- October 2012
- September 2012
- June 2012
- June 2011
-
Meta
How to succeed at interviews for research positions
Given that we work in a research institute, it is often our job to take on trainees, pre-PhD candidates, post-doctoral researchers and even fellow faculty applicants.
I will focus currently only on the amusing incidents (that also highlight a potential lacuna in the preparedness of interview candidates), in order to make the process more productive for both the candidate and the interviewer.
Despite the long-term nature of PhDs and the effort and cost involved in preparing (entrance tests, travel, hard studying, etc.), it always amazes me how poorly prepared the large majority of PhD candidates are when they come to interviews.
My top-3 list of amusing answers that are symptomatic of this:
A: Ummmm……. I haven’t really thought about it.
A: I don’t have time to read, since I am busy preparing to crack competitive exams.
OR
A: I have read about protein X (put the last thing they mugged before boarding the train/bus/flight), and how it affects Y (disease) by Z (mechanism).
A:I will hand the bottle to the technician.
OR
We were not taught this.
OR
It’s the fault of our College/Professor/University, that I can’t answer that question.
Interestingly, most interviews focus on how well the candidates basics are. Having said that the perfect candidate is the one who has mastered the basics- the degree certificate is validated- AND has original ideas about what s/he wants to do in future.